the-google-plus-project-intro

With Google Plus being almost two weeks underway we have seen an immense number of discussions about it. And for a reason. People are still trying to figure out what the extra value is. Opinions differ, but Google Plus might very well be the game changer for the web. And we will see a lot more in the upcoming weeks. Google has been unfolding their social efforts for a while and is far from done.

There is, I feel, a lot of misunderstanding about Google+. Many compare this to Facebook and feel this is supposed to be a Facebook killer and I’ve also heard a lot of people who feel that Google should have launched a more finished product. There are many who think this is it. It is not, Google has only just begun.

If you listen carefully to what Googlers are saying you will get some nice insights into what the intentions from Google are. They are going to change the online world with Google Plus and the crux is personalization and integration.

Why now?

A comment I’ve heard multiple times in the past weeks is: “Why did Google launch Google+ now? It’s not finished! We are missing features. They should have launched a fully working product! My mom or dad will never switch from Facebook like this.”

Is this a valid point? Well maybe, if you would look at Google+ as a product in the lines of GMail, Buzz or Blogger. But you shouldn’t. This is not a product, but a project, this is much bigger.

the google plus project What is Google+ Really all About?Bradley Horowitz, one of the leaders of the Plus-team, told AllThingDigital:

“We’re calling this the Google+ project for a reason. It’s not a monolithic product. This is a project and when we say “project” we mean it’s much broader in scope. This is something that will impact Google.”


Google is going places with this project. And that is why they are taking this project one step at a time. We have seen many signals in the last year or so of Google heading in this direction. They have been dropping ‘social layers’ on us. The ‘pimping’ of the Google Profiles was an apparently small but very important step but also the “shared by” options you see below search results are an indication of where things are heading.

The launch of Google+ was a next step, and this time it was a huge one. But also one which couldn’t be postponed anymore. When you’ve read Stephen Levy’s article on Wired you will know that Google has been working on this project for a while now. There have been many Googlers testing this. That is nice, but at some point you’ll need to test on a bigger audience. And that time has come.

To really test Google needed the ‘real users’ and not just the Googlers, so they opened Google+ for the public.

social layers google What is Google+ Really all About?Google has been known to test their stuff “in the wild”. The black bar which we now see on top of all Google products is an example of that. In this case testing like that was impossible. Word would have gotten out immediately. So Google decided to roll it out now, even though they are not in ‘full mode’ yet. But it fits in how Google works. Last week Eric Schmidt talked to TechCrunch and noted:

“We test stuff, and when it works, we put a lot more emphasis on it.”

They have been testing Google+ in the past few weeks, and it works…

From data to people

Google+ is NOT the Facebook killer which many think (or hope) it is. Off course Google would like to ‘steal away’ people from Facebook if they could. And yes, they will be doing some very smart retargeting advertising with it. But the essence of Google+ lies somewhere else: its about connections, data and people. With the social part of Google+ Google is gathering more data about us so they can give us our personalized web.

And the Google+ project is the ‘top layer’ of Google’s integration of all their products into social. It is the new way Google looks at the web: Google looks at your identity and acts on that.

In his talk with TechCrunch Schmidt said:

“The internet needs and identity server and people have been confused and talked of this many times. But the issue in the internet is not the lack of Facebook and the internet is the lack of identity.”

That sounds a bit vague, but this is about recommendations from others. Schmidt continued:

“We’re trying to use the identity infrastructure to make the Google products really interesting. The most obvious one has to do with like You Tube recommendations search recommendations so forth, so on. We can do this based on who you are accurately and more so who your friends are.”

google data to social What is Google+ Really all About?

Where in the past Google always looked at links and connections between sites, Google is now looking at connections between people. More links does not necessarily mean that a site is better for a specific person, but if his or her friends say it is…

Google’s new way of looking at it is much more social: they rank or offer content based not just on links but also on recommendations from your social circle.

And Google is going to implement this on every single product they have.

The importance of data

To make their social strategy work Google needs data. Because data helps Google to figure out what kind of information they should give you back. To TechCrunch Schmidt said:

“It would be multiple sources of identity and it would be multiple sources of essentially social networks at the technical level meaning the link structure of who your friends are and so forth.”

The way they gather the data is important. And Google gets that data in different ways, some of these ways are (I’ll get more into depth about these in another post):

1. You give it to them through your behavior or what you actually tell Google
2. Google spiders the web
3. Your social circle
4. Mobile (Android!)
5. Google+

Google+. Yes, it is a data source for Google. They couldn’t get the data through Facebook, so why not get it directly from you? Schmidt already hinted on this at the D-Conference several weeks ago. There when asked about the data they couldn’t get from Facebook he said:

“Google will get social data in alternative ways”

This was before Google+ was launched…

What is next?

At this moment of time Google is not that personalized yet. Schmidt also acknowledged that:

“you won’t see much now because that technology is being improved right now.”

He also said:

“there’s a lot coming.”

We are in for a treat, because Google is far from done. With Google+ they have started their (visible) integration. Google+ as we now see it certainly isn’t the end. It is only the beginning. Google will be rolling out a lot more in the (near) future. Google+ will be the skin around the way Google looks at the web socially and all their products. And as Bill Slawski points out very well:

“I’m anticipating posts and comments from their new social network system to start appearing in Google Web search results sometime soon.”

Schmidt said it like this:

“The assumption that everything will move over to using the Plus infrastructure over time.”

What will we be seeing?

There will be an integration of Google Products and different social elements. That means that there will be more ‘features’ within Google+, yes, we will get integration with other 2.0 services, we will get more share options and all sorts of other social features. There has been a lot of criticism about Google+, as Vic Gundotra noted, and these are mostly about these kind of changes. So we should keep our eyes open for functionality changes soon. Even sooner than we thought.

But more importantly, we have to look at the bigger picture: they will be making everything social and connected.

Google+ Business profiles = Google Places

An example could be the Business Profiles. Many have complained that Google didn’t roll out Google+ Business Profiles right away with the launch of Google+. My hunch is that there were a few reasons for that. First of all it’s the beta-stage Google+ is in now: they are still testing and moving over businesses in a later stage would be very difficult and would mean a lot of support needed for those businesses. And as we all know, Google is not that well equipped when it comes to support…

The biggest reason however could be lying right under our noses: Google Places.

Google has been updating Places immensely in the past year. Local has become mainstream and the Places Pages have become very important. It would make sense if Google+ Businesses will be closely related, if not totally integrated, with Google Places. And don’t rule out Hotpot on this. It now seems like a useless service, but take that into Google+ and things will be looking a lot different.

This will only be one of the steps, but we will probably see a lot more steps towards full integration of Google Products into social. Search results will become social, your Android phone will be one big social machine and we will all be looking at YouTube broadcasts together (Hulu!). YouTube is not being redesigned without a reason right now…

Look at the different Google products and services, figure out how they could be social and connected and you will be a step closer to understanding where Google is going.

It is a whole new way of looking at the web, looking at search and looking at social. Larry Page wasn’t kidding when he connected the Google bonuses to the Social Success of Google…

 

Reading material

Here is some more reading material (if you haven’t had enough icon wink What is Google+ Really all About? ):

And off course be sure to check out Lisa Myers’ guide to Google+!

Oh and naturally I’d really like to hear your view on this, please comment! icon smile What is Google+ Really all About?

Bas van den Beld is a speaker, trainer, online marketing strategist and well-respected blogger. Bas is the owner of Stateofsearch.com and host of the radioshow. -- You can hire Bas to speak, train or consult. -- More articles and bio from Bas van den Beld
Posted in Google, News | Tags: , , ,
  • http://www.monchito.nl/ Ramon Eijkemans

    Well i think you nailed it Bas :) One thing to add: Google+ shouldn’t (and i don’t expect it will) become a greedy walled garden like Facebook is. People don’t want that. I for one am very curious about all kinds of API and integration stuff that is coming that will allow me tie all kinds of website together

  • http://www.vanderwijk.com Johan

    I really want to like Google+, but so far it has failed to impress me.

    For example, the ‘Sports Cars’ Sparks is littered with spam links such as http:// www. thetruthaboutinsurance . com/what-do-insurance-companies-consider-a-sports-car/ (I have deliberately added some spaces in the url). But since it is probably Google search that is providing these links, these results where to be expected.

    Integrating the various Google services to provide a personalized experience sounds fantastic, but things can go horribly wrong if the building blocks they are using are already broken…

    • http://www.basvandenbeld.com Bas van den Beld

      You are right if they were broken, they are not, they just don’t work yet. That is what Schmidt was hinting at when he said “you won’t see much now because that technology is being improved right now.”. They will be rolling that out, we have to keep in mind this is not the full product yet.

      I do agree very much that they need to hurry up before people will run away, my guess is they know that so they will be rolling out new stuff soon (maybe even this week)

  • JJ

    What about SEO? Is these changed or This industry well closed……

    • http://www.basvandenbeld.com Bas van den Beld

      That is a totally different post there, might have to write that too :) . I don’t think SEO is dead or anything, but it will fundamentally change.

  • http://www.furore-internetmarketing.nl/ Furore

    Nice article. I think with this project, Google creates endless opportunities for themselves. The integration with all the Google based programmes will be, (at least I hope) great.

  • http://www.themediaflow.com Nichola Stott

    Hi Bas,

    I think Google+ is primarily a data collection exercise fundamental to serendipitous search: http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/7763-the-future-of-search-serendipitous-search

    All of the above is part of a roadmap with products informing products contributing additional dimensions to data that have not been possible before.

    • http://www.basvandenbeld.com Bas van den Beld

      Totally agree, I think we are on one line here. Google+ is not about the network per se, it is about the data. I do think that it is about more than search too btw.

    • http://newtownsearch.com Bryan

      Agreed, but surely Google realizes that this initial data is skewed and will be skewed until they get a significant user base. This ‘data’ would seem to be mostly useless at this point — since it’s primarily the early adopters — i.e. marketers talking to marketers. So at what point does this data become valuable?

      • http://www.basvandenbeld.com Bas van den Beld

        They will off course realize that. But you have to start somewhere and with estimates of 10 million people already there they are getting that data fast. And don’t be fooled, the data is not gathered just on Google+, it is gathered around all Google products. Your searches, your Gmail, your maps-behavior, you don’t have to be on Google+ to hand Google data.

  • http://newtownsearch.com Bryan

    Do people really need want another social network? While some points of the article are interesting, in my opinion Google+ doesn’t offer anything significant enough for average users to make the change from Facebook, where ALL their friends are.

    Sure marketers will jump on the bandwagon like they always do, but this isn’t a game changer like some are saying. Google is however utilizing social media better than they have in the past promoting their new project.

    • http://www.basvandenbeld.com Bas van den Beld

      Looking at the responses people don’t mind another social network… It doesn’t have to mean they switch networks. They can maintain both.

      And again, +1 is everywhere, that is the essence of this post also. You cannot miss it, when you are doing a search, its there, when you are in Gmail, its there, etcetera. And imagine you doing a search and seeing one of your friends has recommended it, the chance that you click that link has just become much bigger.

  • http://www.erocket.co.uk/ Dave Fowler

    A fascinating read and very thought provoking – I now find myself reflecting on what other clues are out there that might reflect Google’s ‘big picture’.

    For example, Google’s Webmaster Central Blog has very recently been posting a lot on Google + (understandably) but also on authorship markup and on their support for schema.org (they’re not alone amongst search providers in that support, of course, but maybe they’ve been at the helm?). That all seems to fit?

    I’m also going to re-read Google’s announcement yesterday of the new product search feed specs and policies (http://googlemerchantblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/important-changes-to-google-product.html) – maybe the new requirements (to be obligatory from September 2011) will hint at opportunities for social integration? Certainly they state that they are “confident that the new feed specifications will have a strong impact on the user experience”.

    OK, maybe we could now go too far speculating about every piece of information they put out there, but it’s going to be fun doing some detective work. Certainly the pace of change at Google seems to have accelerated, which of course is exactly what was anticipated with Larry Page moving into the role of CEO. A fascinating time to work in Internet marketing!

    P.S. Everyone is talking about G+ as it compares to Facebook. Having explored G+ (as an interface I rate it over FB, BTW), I think the competitive opportunities are much broader. If I were LinkedIn I’d be very nervous right now.

  • http://adrenalinfeed.com adrenalinfeed

    I´m really starting to wonder how any other search engine in the future can even have the slightest chance to compete against Google, if the personalized search model they are developing, actually is working well (I can´t see why it shouldn´t). But, will good resources be “buried” in search for something, just because you have friends with different interests than you?

  • Pingback: Google+ – Here today, gone tomorrow OR Here to Stay | Holistic Search Marketing

  • http://www.cynicinutah.com/author/shamusmccrary/ Shamus McCrary

    I can’t wait to see what happens with Google+ as it develops. The current version of it already has me migrating contacts from Facebook and Twitter, and I only suspect it will pull more into it as time goes on.

  • http://www.mangiamarketing.com Anthony Mangia

    Great article! I think you hit the nail right on the head. For years I’ve been thinking that Google organized the web around data and Facebook organized the web around people, and I always wondered who had the right model moving forwards. Google+ is an admission by Google that social data is indeed quite important. I wrote a post last night breaking down the search signals that will come out of Google+, and how they will change SEO – check it out: http://mangiamarketing.com/how-will-google-change-search-engine-optimization/

  • http://www.seo-theory.com/ Michael Martinez

    You have it all wrong. We were getting close — *THIS* close — to figuring out Panda, so Google threw a new toy to the SEO industry and squirreled us.

    • http://www.basvandenbeld.com Bas van den Beld

      Ha, that would be something, but that is more of a conspiracy theory, which I do not think it is

  • http://salamov-rijadic.blogspot.com/ Slamet Riyadi

    I agree that SEO will be fundamentally change, but how and so far ? The new version of Google has confusing many people like me…

  • Pingback: Friday Night Links: Ready to Read | Single Grain Blog

  • oleg

    Very well thought out article, which mirrors my own opinion about Google + almost by word. Integration is the key. It is not in a Beta stage, it is in developmental stage and will keep changing as it grows and evolves over a period of time. In time being a part of this project may cease to be a matter of choice and become a matter of necessity and later inevitability, as it evolves into artificial neural network, the first of kind on such a grand scale.

  • Pingback: This Week in SEO – July #3 | Ultimate SEO Page

  • Pingback: What is Google+ About? How will this affect the web? « GlobalClickz Internet Marketing Blog

  • Pingback: Google+: The best part you’ve ever been to ..if only there were more people partying. « Social Media Course Blog

  • Pingback: Online social behavior is set to take the… | YogeshDhingra.com

  • Pingback: Meet our 2011 Bloggers: The Man himself (Bas van den Beld) - Specials - State of Search

  • Pingback: The Next Step in the Google+ Masterplan: “Search Plus Your World” - Google, News - State of Search

  • Pingback: What is ‘Search, Plus Your World’ | Zazzle Media

  • Pingback: Google Adds Nicknames to Google+ (Not Pseudonyms!) - Google, News - State of Search

  • Pingback: What’s the fuss about Google+ « My Blog