<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing in 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bing-in-2010</link>
	<description>State of Search - Where Search and Social meet up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:51:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers highlight: Nichola Stott (@nicholastott) &#187; State of Search - State of Search</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-12966</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers highlight: Nichola Stott (@nicholastott) &#187; State of Search - State of Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-12966</guid>
		<description>[...] best post on State of Search was probably my first – Bing in 2010. I spent a fair bit of time on it and despite the fact it was written in February 2010 the crux of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] best post on State of Search was probably my first – Bing in 2010. I spent a fair bit of time on it and despite the fact it was written in February 2010 the crux of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind offer, Nichola. Very very kind of you.
I think the real truth is, (and I don&#039;t even want to admit this out loud) I feel like our SEO team has more or less &quot;mastered&quot; AdWords - we&#039;ve been working at it for years, through all it&#039;s iterations. But we just ... don&#039;t know how to &quot;do&quot; Yahoo PPC.
And Bing? Forget it. I was imagining they were basically the same in principle, but then when you runt the SAME exact ads, for the SAME exact keywords, landing on the SAME exact website but get radically DIFFERENT results, it makes you wonder.

So, short answer is: I think we need a basic primer on Yahoo SSM. Let&#039;s stick with that for now; when we master that, then maybe, maybe we&#039;ll move on to Bing. 

I hopped on to your website and blog and twitter, and found that you are an &quot;ex-Yahoo! search geek&quot;. MMM. My type of gal :-)

But seriously, since you I&#039;m sure are a Yahoo fu master, if you would be so kind as to help, I would be grateful. I know you&#039;re running a biz and can&#039;t give away too much etc., etc., and the time factor, etc., but I&#039;d sure be happy to do some kind of barter with you.

I&#039;ll email you 
Thanks

Eric Bryant
Director
Gnosis Arts 
Greater NYC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind offer, Nichola. Very very kind of you.<br />
I think the real truth is, (and I don&#8217;t even want to admit this out loud) I feel like our SEO team has more or less &#8220;mastered&#8221; AdWords &#8211; we&#8217;ve been working at it for years, through all it&#8217;s iterations. But we just &#8230; don&#8217;t know how to &#8220;do&#8221; Yahoo PPC.<br />
And Bing? Forget it. I was imagining they were basically the same in principle, but then when you runt the SAME exact ads, for the SAME exact keywords, landing on the SAME exact website but get radically DIFFERENT results, it makes you wonder.</p>
<p>So, short answer is: I think we need a basic primer on Yahoo SSM. Let&#8217;s stick with that for now; when we master that, then maybe, maybe we&#8217;ll move on to Bing. </p>
<p>I hopped on to your website and blog and twitter, and found that you are an &#8220;ex-Yahoo! search geek&#8221;. MMM. My type of gal <img src='http://www.stateofsearch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But seriously, since you I&#8217;m sure are a Yahoo fu master, if you would be so kind as to help, I would be grateful. I know you&#8217;re running a biz and can&#8217;t give away too much etc., etc., and the time factor, etc., but I&#8217;d sure be happy to do some kind of barter with you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll email you<br />
Thanks</p>
<p>Eric Bryant<br />
Director<br />
Gnosis Arts<br />
Greater NYC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nichola Stott</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichola Stott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric - whilst the three (currently) seperate products look the same from the outside; there are specific differences in match technologies, levels of competition, how smart pricing and equivalent (Pricing Discounts in Yahoo!) products work and effect your position. Of couse all of this is without knowing what sector your working in, if it is client or your own brand your advertising for, or even the market(s) you are talking about.

If it helps I&#039;m more than happy to have a chat about this to see if I can give you a steer in the right direction. If you want to, you can email me nichola.stott(at)themediaflow.com to swap numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric &#8211; whilst the three (currently) seperate products look the same from the outside; there are specific differences in match technologies, levels of competition, how smart pricing and equivalent (Pricing Discounts in Yahoo!) products work and effect your position. Of couse all of this is without knowing what sector your working in, if it is client or your own brand your advertising for, or even the market(s) you are talking about.</p>
<p>If it helps I&#8217;m more than happy to have a chat about this to see if I can give you a steer in the right direction. If you want to, you can email me nichola.stott(at)themediaflow.com to swap numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Nichola, for the reply. 
You&#039;re really good. I love the in-depth statistical research and market research. You&#039;ve convinced me that we didn&#039;t really give YSM or MSN Ad Center a fair hearing. 

 The volume was fine with YSM/Bing. r.

As a follow up, do you think the best practice SEM for PPC differs much in YSM/BING as compared with AdWords? I fear I may be missing something since I focus so exclusively on &quot;mastering&quot; AdWords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nichola, for the reply.<br />
You&#8217;re really good. I love the in-depth statistical research and market research. You&#8217;ve convinced me that we didn&#8217;t really give YSM or MSN Ad Center a fair hearing. </p>
<p> The volume was fine with YSM/Bing. r.</p>
<p>As a follow up, do you think the best practice SEM for PPC differs much in YSM/BING as compared with AdWords? I fear I may be missing something since I focus so exclusively on &#8220;mastering&#8221; AdWords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nichola Stott</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichola Stott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric,

I&#039;m sorry that these two sources didn&#039;t deliver a good ROI for you. I know it can be difficult to find the volumes on these networks, particulalry in very niche sectors; however our experience on behalf of clients has always seen comparable ROI from these sources.

I&#039;d be interested to know - did you run the same campaigns, keywords and copy on each provider? We often find that tailoring a campaign is required. As an example a lot of MSN searches occur off Bing and on network properties. Perhaps it could be worthwhile to do some demographic research and run a test campaign accordingly?

If your difficulties have been very much tied to volume then yes, the partnership could have a significant effect on ROI potential. If we were operating in a vacuum, then volume potential should double to a combined 7.4% (UK) share of market. Of course it is not as easy as that, as the partnership involves integrating the Yahoo! sales team to sell on the Adcentre platform. It&#039;s going to take some time to integrate systems, move Yahoo! advertisers, absorb the respective partner networks and so on. I&#039;d like to hope that during this time - Bing make an aggressive move to market in Europe, and release these product relevancy improvements that we&#039;ve heard about; otherwise Google will erode this 7.4% potential before we even get to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry that these two sources didn&#8217;t deliver a good ROI for you. I know it can be difficult to find the volumes on these networks, particulalry in very niche sectors; however our experience on behalf of clients has always seen comparable ROI from these sources.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know &#8211; did you run the same campaigns, keywords and copy on each provider? We often find that tailoring a campaign is required. As an example a lot of MSN searches occur off Bing and on network properties. Perhaps it could be worthwhile to do some demographic research and run a test campaign accordingly?</p>
<p>If your difficulties have been very much tied to volume then yes, the partnership could have a significant effect on ROI potential. If we were operating in a vacuum, then volume potential should double to a combined 7.4% (UK) share of market. Of course it is not as easy as that, as the partnership involves integrating the Yahoo! sales team to sell on the Adcentre platform. It&#8217;s going to take some time to integrate systems, move Yahoo! advertisers, absorb the respective partner networks and so on. I&#8217;d like to hope that during this time &#8211; Bing make an aggressive move to market in Europe, and release these product relevancy improvements that we&#8217;ve heard about; otherwise Google will erode this 7.4% potential before we even get to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Nichola, do you think that the new partnership b/t Yahoo &amp; Bing means SEMs should resume YSM and MSN AdCenter PPC? We&#039;ve stopped PPC with Yahoo and MSN a while ago b/c they just weren&#039;t delivering the ROI of AdWords - not even close. But this new merger now makes me wonder whether we should renew again our interest in PPC for the two? What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nichola, do you think that the new partnership b/t Yahoo &amp; Bing means SEMs should resume YSM and MSN AdCenter PPC? We&#8217;ve stopped PPC with Yahoo and MSN a while ago b/c they just weren&#8217;t delivering the ROI of AdWords &#8211; not even close. But this new merger now makes me wonder whether we should renew again our interest in PPC for the two? What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 02/23/2010 - SeoAlchemist - How to make gold with SEO.</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 02/23/2010 - SeoAlchemist - How to make gold with SEO.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Bing in 2010 – a great post from Nichola Stott on Bas’ (formerly of SearchCowboys) new blog. She looks at where Bing is going and how they might some day cut into the market share of the mighty Goog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bing in 2010 – a great post from Nichola Stott on Bas’ (formerly of SearchCowboys) new blog. She looks at where Bing is going and how they might some day cut into the market share of the mighty Goog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 02/23/2010 &#124; Search Engine Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 02/23/2010 &#124; Search Engine Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] Bing in 2010 – a great post from Nichola Stott on Bas’ (formerly of SearchCowboys) new blog. She looks at where Bing is going and how they might some day cut into the market share of the mighty Goog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bing in 2010 – a great post from Nichola Stott on Bas’ (formerly of SearchCowboys) new blog. She looks at where Bing is going and how they might some day cut into the market share of the mighty Goog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Aye I read that piece. Bad PR for Google, although they&#039;ve since improved their privacy safeguards,

But privacy and Google have never been friends. It&#039;s only become much more apparent in recent times that they really don&#039;t care about personal privacy. My mind still boggles at Eric Schmidt&#039;s hopelessly naive and ignorant statement when he said &quot;If you have something that you don&#039;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&#039;t be doing it in the first place.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye I read that piece. Bad PR for Google, although they&#8217;ve since improved their privacy safeguards,</p>
<p>But privacy and Google have never been friends. It&#8217;s only become much more apparent in recent times that they really don&#8217;t care about personal privacy. My mind still boggles at Eric Schmidt&#8217;s hopelessly naive and ignorant statement when he said &#8220;If you have something that you don&#8217;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nichola Stott</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofsearch.com/bing-in-2010/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Nichola Stott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stateofsearch.com/?p=104#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I think the lady in question has protected her content now; however here is a Guardian piece on the story:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/feb/12/google-buzz-stalker-privacy-problems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the lady in question has protected her content now; however here is a Guardian piece on the story:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/feb/12/google-buzz-stalker-privacy-problems" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/feb/12/google-buzz-stalker-privacy-problems</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

